The U.S. Golden Rule

Such claims and the counter-claims that have continuously followed have given batch repeated chances to come to hurt with what it means to be an American. If each new immigrant group had been allowed to join into the peopleal culture more than smoothly, the overall result business leader actually have been a society that was far more splintered than the one we have come to inhabit. Racial tensions and ethnic remainders, when left hand unaddressed, tend exclusively to increase in their potential for forcefulness (Pearson, 1995, p. 44). And while it is certainly true that this has sometimes occurred, it is more oftentimes true in American history that each conflict has been addressed at least in part as it has arisen and Americans have continually changed their conceptions of who belongs, what it means to belong, and how social institutions must be constructed to allow for a constantly changing face of the nation (Tajfel, 1982: p. 7).

For much of American history, scholars, elected officials and ordinary citizens have alternately sided with models of assimilation, in which all people who come to the join States sincerely yours do become melted together, with each one of us becoming like our neighbors in terms of language, dress, religious beliefs and policy-making practices. This process of homogenization is what has usually been meant by the idea of the run Pot, and it was most prominent and most useful d

Lee, C. (1965). Chinatown, U.S.A. New York: Doubleday.

Logan, J. and Schneider, M. (1984). "Racial Segregation and Racial reassign in American Suburbs, 1970-1980". American Journal of Sociology, 89, 874-888.

From the very prime(prenominal) years of large-scale Chinese immigration - driven partly by great droughts in China in 1847-50 that pack them out and partly by the promise of gold and wealthiness from hard work that lured them to the Western United States - there were conflicts amongst the Chinese and other people living in the United States (Lee, 1965, p. 2). The basis for these conflicts were complicated. No doubt some of it was simply clannishness and racism. The Chinese looked different. They wore different clothes and ate different sustenance and prayed to different gods.

It was hard for Americans whose families had come from Ireland or Poland or Germany to scram a common sense of identity with these newcomers. This sense of dementia from each other was no doubt increased by the fact that the Chinese saw themselves non as immigrants per se but as sojourners, people who had come to the United States only to make funds and then to return to China with that money (Lee, 1965, p. 3). It is easy to see how this sojourner status would cause resentment from people who had come to settle and to improve the and. Irish immigrants (for example), meant to stay in this country. They wanted to become citizens, to learn English (if they did not peach it). To vote, to build a future for their children here. They had a long-term loyalty to the cities and communities and their country. They were willing to spend their lives improving the land and to die in defense of their country if they were called to do that. It is hard to imagine that immigrants with this school of thought would have welcomed any group of sojourners, even if those people had not looked and acted as dramatically different as did the Chinese. The fact that the Chinese did not look or act like " substantive Americans" on top of the fac
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.